It is typical and very cheesy but as I said all of this intentional as no one could write such corny dialogue or create such terrible characters accidentally.Īs for the actual storyline well to be honest it plays second fiddle because whilst we have a giant snake on the loose and another one being used to track it down it is uninteresting. The action is just as bad with a comically macabre tone and then we have of course a typical moment of romance as Monica and Emmett connect as they go snake hunting. Python' is intentionally b-movie at its corniest from characters which are over the top caricatures to the cornball dialogue they spout. And so it goes on because everything about 'Boa vs. Python' to establish its intentions when we get an early scene featuring a naked woman, it is not the only sexual scene in the movie which includes one featuring a large snake and a woman in a car, but it does scream b-movie. At the same time Broddick has assembled a group of hunters to also go after his Python in a big snake safari. Woller) enlists the help of snake expert Emmett (David Hewlett) and behavioural scientist Monica (Jaime Bergman) to try and track the Python down using Emmett's giant Boa. When an 80-foot python being shipped into the United States by wealthy hunter and casino owner Broddick (Adamo Palladino) special agent Sharpe (Kirk B.R.

Technically I feel like I should be condemning this movie for being so bad but I can't because you know that to be so tacky could only have been done intentionally and by being so tacky, so low grade it is actually entertaining. Python' is bad, it is chock full of cliches, corny dialogue, cheesy characters, poor special effects, lousy writing and pretty much everything which you would normally criticize a movie for but then all of this was intentional or I hope so. If a movie was made to be intentionally bad does it mean it is a bad movie if that is how it comes across? I ask because 'Boa vs.

Angel boris reed boa vs python